UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND STUDENT COURSEWORK ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT AND PLAGIARISM RULES

UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND STUDENT COURSEWORK ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT AND PLAGIARISM RULES

At the end of each academic year the Records Manager will submit a report to the Academic Board listing by School the number of investigations that were carried out. This penalty may only be applied to breaches specified under Paragraph 10b vi — xii and Paragraph 10c xi — xii. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. The examination may be a supervised written examination or a viva voce examination. Excluded students do not have an automatic right of re-admission. Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit.

Good scholarship refers to and builds upon the work of others. It plays a major role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes. It plays a major role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties.

It plays a major role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Procedures / UNE Policy Register System

coursewwork An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation or determination of the case. This penalty may only be applied to breaches specified under Paragraph 10b vi — xii and Paragraph 10c xi — xii. The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of the initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision.

Where the Academic Director is also the Unit Coordinator, the Head of School or nominee is authorised to investigate and impose penalties. Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit. Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others. Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit.

  HAZARDOUS MATERIAL BUSINESS PLAN HMBP REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Procedures

Examples of acts of inadvertent plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules. The report must be made within five plagiaism days of the alleged incident occurring or being identified. Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation.

This penalty may only be applied to breaches specified under Paragraph 10b vi — xii and Paragraph 10c xi — xii. The records must be retained for at least ten years after the student’s graduation from the University. Late responses shall be handled as appeals.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

It plays a major role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as an basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes. An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation or determination of the case.

The Appeal Officer or Committee Chair will forward a report Template A6 and all associated documents to univerdity Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer who will review the case but not receive representations when making a decision.

Plagiagism University does not tolerate dishonesty and impropriety in academic work and imposes strict penalties on any student found to have acted dishonestly or improperly in assessment processes. They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties. The file must be created by the Records Management Office and stored in line with University policy.

On completion of the specified period of exclusion, the Student is eligible to return to a Residential College although conditions on readmission may be applied. This is not a current document.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule / UNE Policy Register System

Where the case is dealt with as intentional plagiarism rulfs Student will be provided with a copy of these Rules and will be advised in writing of:. Appellants should structure their appeal in terms of Paragraph a — c and provide evidence to support their appeal.

  OCR CHEMISTRY COURSEWORK TITRATION

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: Late responses shall be handled as appeals. A copy of a reprimand will be held on the student’s individual file.

Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others. The Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer has authority to uphold the penalty, or refer the penalty to the Student Conduct Appeals Committee for reconsideration as appropriate. These reports must ensure that parties involved cannot be identified. Before any penalty is applied to a student in a partnership arrangement, consultation is to take place between UNE and Partner Representatives to ensure that any penalties are equitably applied across the two institutions.

Excluded students do not have an automatic right of re-admission.

Only the Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean or nominee may act under the circumstances set out in Paragraph 37 and Where it is suspected that a submitted assessment task, or part thereof, has not been written by the Student the Unit Coordinator may ask the Investigating Officer to arrange an examination on the relevant topic as part of the process of stjdent of authorship. Where an investigator determines that, prior to the submission of the current assignment, a Acaademic had been informed that there have been two or more previously englamd occurrences of proven Inadvertent Plagiarism, the investigation of the most recent allegation shall proceed on the basis that the allegation is of Intentional Plagiarism.

The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of the initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision.