Political terminology Political term stubs. A highly integrated central metropole, a periphery that is fractured enough not to provide any reasonable competition, and a common interest religious, military, political that can integrate the periphery with the metropole. Both methods can be useful, as this essay will demonstrate, in explaining the reasons behind imperial decline. The Peace of Illusions: This, along with the Sino-Soviet split, demonstrated that the monolithic power arrangements that had been solidified in the years following World War II up into the s would not remained fixed.
You are commenting using your Google account.
The Danger of Imperial Overstretch
The other major issue in any exploration of the historiography of imperial overstretch is the methodology various authors have employed to describe it. This article about a political term is a stub. Views Read Edit View history.
Notify me of new comments via email. Like Alexis de Tocqueville, who Kennedy could claim as a predecessor, he saw an emergent bipolar world, dominated by Russia and the United States. Other works also occupy the space of American hegemony within the historiography of the Cold War.
American Ascendancy and Its Predecessors Boston: Beyond the costs of the wars, Ferguson also warned of the forthcoming fiscal deficit that will expand as more baby boomers retire and claim Social Security and Medicare benefits.
Arrighi and Silver note that the conclusion of U. Nevertheless, this resulted in grave political liabilities that eventually contributed to the collapse of the Soviet system.
Overstfetch, for his part, was astutely aware that the bipolar world of the post war era could only last so long. Aside from the cost of waging military conflict or maintaining United States presence abroad, there is a significant, unsustainable overstretching of military personnel and resources. Layne argues that this policy included not only suppressing the influence of the Soviet Union where it could, but also ensuring the preponderance of American influence.
The problem with this approach is that these histories are open to criticism that they are too vague, and are subject to a kind of historical shorthand that misses the nuances of large dynamic shifts. Paul Kennedy’s view has been criticised from many directions, including the postmodern historiographer Hayden White economic historian Niall Ferguson  overstrehch from Marxist writers such as Perry Anderson [ citation needed ] and Alex Callinicos.
The Danger of Imperial Overstretch | Foreign Policy Journal
You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Imperial overstretch – Wikipedia
Might Washington, like Rome, fall victim to imperial overstretch? Foreign Policy Research Institute. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here This is an extremely difficult topic worthy of patient discussion. This page was last edited on 18 Decemberat Imperiall highly integrated central metropole, a periphery that is fractured enough not to provide any reasonable competition, and a common interest religious, military, political that can integrate the periphery with the metropole.
Maier argued that the term was so polarizing, it led to an oversimplification of the varied experiences great powers could have on the world stage. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. We Need to Know. Pin It on Pinterest. A major opponent of this view was Walt Whitman Rostow, who argued against the inevitability of this change in power dynamics.